March 15, 2023
Mohamed Aly Sayed

Lagrangian Particle Tracking in CFD

Overview

Lagrangian Particle Tracking (LPT) is a powerful technique used in Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) to simulate the behavior of individual particles as they move through a fluid system. In LPT, each particle is treated as an individual entity that interacts with the surrounding fluid, and its motion is tracked over time. This technique can be used to model a wide range of phenomena in areas such as engineering applications: simulating the mixing of fuel droplets in the combustion chamber of propulsion systems; environmental applications: simulating the dispersion of pollutants emerging from factories formation and growth of raindrops, and transport of atmospheric aerosols; medical applications: simulating the drug delivery to pulmonary systems and deposition of blood cells in the human body [1-5].

Particle-Fluid Modeling

To model the interaction between the particles and the fluid flow, different classes of coupling can be used. One-way coupling is the simplest and most commonly used approach, where the particles are assumed to have no effect on the fluid flow. Two-way coupling, on the other hand, considers the effect of the particles on the fluid flow (the particle's wake increases dissipation in the carrier fluid), as well as the fluid's effect on the particles. Three-way coupling takes into account the mutual interaction between the fluid flow and particles, also, the effect of the influent of a particle's motion through the fluid on another particle. Four-way coupling involves all that happens in the three-way plus particle-particle collision on top. Modeling each of these coupling classes has its own advantages and limitations, and the choice of coupling depends on the specific application and the level of detail required in the simulation.

A schematic representing the coupling between the fluid and the dispersed particle according to loading level.

One of the key advantages of Lagrangian particle tracking is its ability to provide detailed information about the behavior of individual particles. By tracking the position, velocity, and other properties of each particle over time, researchers can gain insights into the transport and dispersion of particles in complex fluid systems. Another important application of Lagrangian particle tracking is in the modeling of turbulent flows. Turbulence is a complex phenomenon that is difficult to simulate using traditional methods. However, by tracking large numbers of low-inertia (i.e. tracer particles) through a turbulent flow, researchers can gain a better understanding of the dynamics of turbulence and how it affects particle transport.

Using tracer particles is a widely used technique in CFD to study the behavior of complex turbulent flows under the well-mixed criterion. Tracer particles are typically small, non-reactive particles that are added to a fluid system to help visualize the flow patterns and transport mechanisms. By tracking the position and velocity of tracer particles as they move through a fluid system, researchers can gain insights into the turbulent mixing and dispersion of particles in the flow. This technique is particularly useful in applications where the well-mixed criterion is important, such as in chemical reactions or environmental transport modeling. By using tracer particles in CFD simulations, researchers can improve our understanding of the complex behavior of turbulent flows and develop more accurate models for a wide range of applications.

Lagrangian particle tracking is also useful in the modelling of multiphase flows, where two or more phases (e.g., liquid-gas or solid-liquid) are present. By tracking particles of different phases through the system, researchers can gain insights into the behavior of each phase and how they interact with each other. To accurately model particle motion in such flows, it is very important to solve the underlying fluid dynamics (carrier medium) equations with a high degree of accuracy. This involves simulating the complex interactions between the fluid and the particles, such as fluid-particle collisions, drag forces, and turbulence effects. By accurately capturing these interactions, Lagrangian particle tracking can provide insights into the behaviour of particle-laden flows that are difficult to obtain through experimental measurements alone.

A fully developed turbulent channel flow at shear Reynolds number Re=150

Implementation Framework

To implement an LPT algorithm in a CFD code, a two-step procedure is usually performed; a search step and an interpolation step. In the search step, the computational domain is scanned to detect the closest cell center (e.g. in cell-centered codes) to the particle location. Then, from the cell index, the closest node to this particle can be identified. This is a necessary operation at the first time step where particles are just introduced into the domain. Once done, the algorithm locates the neighbouring cells encapsulating the particle’s closest node. In an optimized fashion, those very surrounding cells are to be scanned for the next time step after advancing the particle (i.e. instead of scanning the whole domain) and so on.  

For advancing particles, one additional transport equation to fluid flow equations has to be solved for each individual particle, which is known as the Lagrangian Equation of Motion (LEM). This equation is simply the manifestation of Newton's second law - accounting for the sum of forces acting on the particle (see Ref. 11).

The Lagrangian equation of motion - LPT

Best practices

As mentioned above, simulating particle-laden flows in Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) requires careful consideration of several factors to ensure accurate and reliable results. Here are some of the best practices that should be followed when simulating particle-laden flows in CFD:

  1. Properly define particle properties (in true-particle simulation): Particle size, shape, and density are critical properties that must be accurately defined to simulate particle-laden flows. The particle size should be within the range of 10-100 times smaller than the smallest grid size used in the simulation. The shape of the particles should also be considered, as non-spherical particles can significantly affect the flow behavior. Accurately defining the density of particles is important for predicting their motion in the flow.
  2. Choose the appropriate models: Various models are available for simulating particle-laden flows in CFD, including Lagrangian and Eulerian models. The choice of model depends on the nature of the problem being solved. Lagrangian models are suitable for modeling dilute particle-laden flows, whereas Eulerian models are better suited for modeling dense flows.
  3. Use appropriate boundary conditions: Proper boundary conditions must be applied to accurately represent physics of particle motion. For example, if the particles are depositing on solid walls, the type of particle-wall collision must be defined properly.
  4. Consider particle-particle interactions: Particle-particle interactions such as collision and agglomeration should be considered for dense particle-laden flows. This requires additional models to be incorporated into the LEM.
  5. Use appropriate numerical schemes: The numerical schemes used for solving the Navier-Stokes equations must be appropriate for capturing the physics of particle-laden flows. High-order schemes such as spectral methods and finite volume methods are commonly used for particle-laden flows.
  6. Validate the simulation: It is essential to validate the simulation by comparing the results with experimental data or other numerical simulations. This helps to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the simulation.
  7. Optimize computational resources: Particle-laden flows simulations can be computationally expensive (especially with the LES approach), and it is crucial to optimize the computational resources available to ensure reasonable simulation times.

By following these best practices, accurate and reliable results of the particle-laden flows can be obtained.


Hands on

In summary, Lagrangian particle tracking is a powerful tool that is transforming the way we model and understand fluid systems. As research continues in this area, we can expect to see even more exciting applications of this technique in a wide range of industries.

For more details about the implementation of LPT, a simple and easy-to-understand algorithm is implemented in the Open-Source code T-Flows. The code features a few test cases that are easy to run on a personal computer. The algorithm has been verified and validated through several benchmarks [6-11]. The latest version of the code is accessible through Github link above.

References

  1. G.C. Morrison, P. Zhao, L. Kasthuri, The spatial distribution of pollutant transport to and from indoor surfaces, Atmos. Environ. 40 (2006) 3677–3685.
  2. T. Kam, L.C. Hsia, T. Chang, Clean room particle monitor, airflow simulation and measurement for aerosol reduction, J. Aerosol Sci. 29 (1998) 254.
  3. M.P. Wana, C.Y.H. Chaoa, Y.D. Nga, G.N. Sze Toa, W.C. Yub, Dispersion of expiratory droplets in a general hospital ward with ceiling mixing type mechanical ventilation system, Aerosol. Sci. Technol. 41 (2007) 244–258.
  4. S.B. Poussou, S. Mazumdar, M.W. Plesniak, P.E. Sojka, Q. Chen, Flow and contaminant transport in an airliner cabin induced by a moving body: model experiments and CFD predictions, Atmos. Environ. 44 (2010) 2830–2839.
  5. A.V. Jones, M. Kissane, State of understanding of fission product transport in the circuit and of aerosol behaviour in the containment of Phebus, J. Aerosol Sci. 31 (Supplement 1) (2000) S37–S38.
  6. M. A. Sayed, A. Dehbi, M. A. Hadziabdic, B. Niceno, K. Mikityuk, On sub-grid scale modeling in a differentially heated cavity using coarse large eddy simulation, ERCOFTAC, ETMM13, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2110.00389.
  7. M. A. Sayed, A. Dehbi, B. Niceno, K. Mikityuk, On the Prediction of Turbulent Kinetic Energy in Channel Flow Using Wall-Modeled Large Eddy Simulations, 2020, https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2020-1329 volume aiaa 2020-1329.
  8. M. A. Sayed, A. Dehbi, B. Niceno, K. Mikityuk, M. Krinner, Flow simulation of gas cyclone separator at high Reynolds number using the elliptic-relaxation hybrid les/ rans (er-hrl) model, in: Proceedings of the 6th World Congress on Momentum, Heat and Mass Transfer (Mhmt’21, 2021, https://doi.org/10.11159/icmfht21.lx.110.
  9. M. A. Sayed, A. Dehbi, B. Niceno, K. Mikityuk, Particle subgrid scale modeling in hybrid RANS/LES of turbulent channel flow at low to moderate Reynolds number, J. Powder Technology 397 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2021.11.057
  10. M. A. Sayed, M. A. Hadziabdic, A. Dehbi , B. Niceno, K. Mikityuk, Simulation of flow and heat transfer in a differentially heated cubical cavity using coarse Large Eddy Simulation, International J. Thermal Sciences, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2022.107892
  11. M. A. Sayed, On the Capability of Wall-Modeled Large Eddy Simulations to Predict Particle Dispersion in Complex Turbulent Flows, PhD Thesis number 10054, EPFL Press, 2022.